# Here are vector buttons and width of the border and hadlers Style * !MWMFunctions, MWMDecor, HintOverride, !MWMBordersĭefaultFont “-helvetica-bold-14- "įvwmIdent: Font "-helvetica-bold-14-*”
UXTERM CONFIG WINDOWS
# here we got SGI colors and font for windows and menu
# Starting xterm iconifiedĪddToFunc StartFunction I Test (init) Exec exec uxterm -iconic #Style xtdesktop NoTitle, NoHandles, Sticky, WindowListSkip, staysOnBottom #Style rclock Title, Handles, WindowShade, Button 1, !Button 2, !Button 4, Sticky, !StickyStippledTitle, WindowListSkip Style *FvwmPager Title, Handles, WindowShade, Button 1, !Button 2, Button 4, Sticky, !StickyStippledTitle, WindowListSkip Style FvwmButtons Title, !Handles, WindowShade, !Button 1, !Button 2, !Button 4, Sticky, !StickyStippledTitle, WindowListSkip, !Closable Style toolchest Title, !Handles, WindowShade, !Button 1, !Button 2, !Button 4, !Closable, Sticky, !StickyStippledTitle, WindowListSkip, !Closable # style for toolchest and sticky applications #Colorset 1 fg black, bg black, SGradient 4 1 red 5 grey, ditherĬolorset 11 fg black, bg #b0b0b0 inactive windowsĬolorset 15 fg black, bg #808080, sh #292929Ĭolorset 3 fg black, bg #808080 active windowsĬolorset 17 fg black, bg #808080, pixmap unknown.xpm # 4DWM-like config for FVWM By Chris Based on work by Yaxkukmo This is still somewhat a work in progress but very useable. You can add to your Irixy experience by using Rox as a desktop manager with the Iris icon set. This is based on work by Yakukmo and customized by me to be more 4Dwm-like and more to my tastes. There are a like these around but I figured one more won’t hurt.
UXTERM CONFIG INSTALL
But if there’s no compelling use case for them to be there by default, just as there’s no longer a compelling use case for Brasero or Empathy to ship out-of-the-box, a little clean-up wouldn’t hurt.Īfter all, those who want them can easily install them from Ubuntu Software.I am posting my config, which is based on 4Dwm. It makes little appreciable difference whether Ubuntu 17.10 ships with 3 separate terminal entries in its launcher or not. We don’t get backup apps for anything else!Īnother supposed reason for the inclusion Xterm is to provide a “complete X env”.īut, as Quigley notes in his email, with Wayland very much on the horizon, mightn’t it make more sense to pull in any critical X environment packages explicitly, rather than relying on a terminal emulator to do so?
But, even assuming it does, is xterm really that much of a benefit when a virtual console is but a combo press of Ctrl + Alt + F2 away? The official reason for including Xterm is to ensure there is a backup terminal available should GNOME Terminal have any issues. I only ever use GNOME Terminal, which is the default Ubuntu terminal emulator, or a GNOME Terminal alternative that I go out and install for myself. In an installed setup, those two menu items make gnome-shell have 3 pages instead of 2 in my testing.” But those differences are, to my end-user eyes at least, not especially self-evident.Ī discussion has kicked off on the Ubuntu desktop mailing list that suggests I am not alone in questioning the value of including quite so many terminals.Ĭanonical’s Brian Quigley explains: “Xterm takes up two menu items (xterm and uxterm) and doesn’t provide any more functionality then gnome-terminal. Naturally I presume there to be some differences between GNOME Terminal, Xterm and UXTerm. But a query that has, from time to time, confused me. It’s a minor little quirk, granted, and something few people will notice. I’ve often wondered why Ubuntu ships with several different terminal apps installed by default.
0 kommentar(er)
